Deutsches Institut für Japanstudien nav lang search
Deutsches Institut für Japanstudien
Linking Preferential Trade Agreements to Domestic Political and Economic Structures:<br>A Comparative Case Study of People’s Republic of China and Japan
Photo by Marco Bianchetti



The registration deadline for this event has passed.

Please subscribe to our DIJ Newsletter to stay informed about our research activities, events, and publications:

    Choose Subscription:

    = required field

    Linking Preferential Trade Agreements to Domestic Political and Economic Structures:
    A Comparative Case Study of People’s Republic of China and Japan

    2020年12月10日 / 18:00 (JST)

    Aya Adachi, Ruhr University Bochum & University of Duisburg-Essen

    Selection of presentation slides (PDF)

    In her presentation Aya Adachi explored the research question of why Preferential Trade Agreements (PTAs) patterns differ in form and scope through a Comparative Political Economy perspective. The cases of China and Japan demonstrate the value of analyzing the role of the state and its interrelations with sub-national and market actors and spheres in PTA policy-making within two vastly different political systems. The cases highlight the conceptual issue and consequences of the state-market dichotomy in the scholarship of PTAs and economic regionalism. A mixed-method approach is applied: content analysis is used to assess China and Japan’s average PTA patterns, while qualitative case studies of China and Japan’s agreements with the ASEAN are carried out through process-tracing to link policy positions of relevant actors and the institutional settings to the PTA outcomes.

    The main findings of this project show that the scope and depth of Japan’s PTAs are more consistent pronounced, while the scope of China’s PTAs are limited, with a main focus on liberalization of trade in goods. These diverging PTA patterns are linked to differences in domestic political economic configurations. Furthermore, these differences in PTA patterns have regional and global economic governance implications: while China is promoting a supplementary and informal approach, Japan is supporting a more regulatory-based governance.

    In the Q&A session, the speaker covered questions regarding further details of the research design and the method of comparing China with Japan. In addition, negative side effects of trade were discussed. 

    Aya Adachi is a PhD fellow at Ruhr University Bochum and the University of Duisburg-Essen, funded by the Mercator Research Center Ruhr (MERCUR). Her research interests include International and Comparative Political Economy of PTAs and trade politics of China and Japan. She works as a consultant for the German Cooperation for International Cooperation (GIZ) and obtained an M.A. degree in International Relations and International Organizations from the University of Groningen.