International Conference Center of Waseda University
To attend the conference, please register with the DIJ by September 5th at the latest:
Individual Responsibility vs. Social Solidarity – Current Economic and Legal Issues Concerning Social Policy in Japan and GermanyConference Languages: Japanese and English (simultaneous translation provided)
September 10 - September 11, 2002
“A democratic capitalist society will keep searching for better ways of drawing the boundary lines between the domain of rights and the domain of dollars. And it can make progress. To be sure, it will never solve the problem, for the conflict between equality and economic efficiency is inescapable. In that sense, capitalism and democracy are really a most improbable mixture. Maybe that is why they need each other – to put some rationality into equality and some humanity into efficiency.”
(Arthur M. Okun)
In recent years, Japan and Germany have been facing very similar challenges: aging populations, changing family and job structures, and globalization. How have these factors influenced social policies in both countries?
Since the end of the 1980s, there has been a heated debate in comparative social policy on how economic internationalization may cause the convergence of welfare systems. One school of thought argues that competition for capital and markets increases pressures on industrialized countries to adopt low wage strategies; this then leads to a reduction of social benefits and weakening labor standards. According to these observers, social policies in those countries will become increasingly similar. Another school of thought argues that nation states in general are not losing their power to pursue distinguished social policies; these critics claim that political, institutional and legal factors still play an important role at the national level.
The purpose of this conference is to undertake a close economic and legal analysis of recent social policy changes in Japan and Germany, which have so far received little or no comparative attention, and thereby contribute to the theoretical debate on convergent versus divergent developments in social policy. Japan and Germany seem to be especially suited for such a comparison because their economic systems and welfare regimes share many similarities; for this reason, converging or diverging tendencies can be traced more easily. In contrast to the Anglo-American free market economies, Japan and Germany have been described as coordinated market economies with close similarities in their financial and economic governance, production systems and management-labor relations. Following Esping-Andersen’s typology of ‘liberal’, ‘conservative’ and ‘social-democratic’ welfare regimes, there is a broad consensus that Germany is a ‘conservative’ regime with strong employment-related social rights and contribution-related benefits. Although there is less consensus on Japan’s position within these regime types, it is clear that there are numerous ‘conservative’ elements such as group specific, contribution-related social insurances and employment-related social rights.
This conference brings together economic and legal experts from Japan and Germany to discuss recent or planned changes in pensions, income policy, long-term care, the non-profit sector, and gender- and age-specific problems in social security. Two issues will be at the center of the comparative analysis:
- To what extent have changing attitudes about individual responsibility and social solidarity led to a redefinition of social policy objectives in Japan and Germany? Are there new trends in social entrepreneurship? How are we to interpret current public debate, which has focused on civil society and community-based remedies?
- What changes are taking place in the various policy fields on the instrumental level? Are we experiencing convergent developments? What similarities and differences exist and how can they be explained? What kind of instrumental adjustments should be in place in order to achieve the respective (changing) policy objectives?
The Univers Foundation
France Bed Medical Home Care Research Subsidy Foundation
Embassy of the Federal Republic of Germany
Day 1 September 10th (Tuesday)
Opening and Greetings
Panel 1: Gender-specific Issues in Social Security for the Elderly
Social security systems in Germany and Japan have historically been based on the model of a male breadwinner. However, the (recent) changes in work, life style and family patterns have yet to be reflected in the setup of those systems. This panel analyses the changing relationship between work and lifestyle, the economic inequality between elderly males and females, and policy makers’ changing attitudes towards gender-specific issues in old age security. The panel will also discuss recent or planned instrumental adjustments in this field.
Panel 2: Economic Inequality Among the Elderly and Reforms of Public Pensions
As public pension benefits in Japan and Germany have been reduced by recent reforms, financial security for the elderly is increasingly becoming a matter of individual responsibility. This panel evaluates the current state of economic inequality among the elderly, analyzes the relationship between economic inequality and public pensions, and examines the current shift in the public-private mix in pensions.
Changing Work and Life Style Patterns and Economic Inequality between Male and Female Elderly in Germany
Jutta ALLMENDINGER, University of Munich
Before beginning my paper, I will present a short movie (11’) that I produced
and which gives a basic overview of how life course and social policy systematically
interact in Germany. While this movie is based on cohorts born between 1919
and 1921, I will also include changes that have occurred since then, focusing
on labor force participation, vertical and horizontal occupational sex segregation,
and pension legislation. How do these changes affect economic inequality
in old age for cohorts soon to reach retirement age? In my answer to this
question, I will rely on longitudinal data from the Max-Planck-Institute
for Education and Human Development in Berlin and the AVID, a data set that
covers cohorts born between 1936 and 1955, and which allows estimates for
their future pension income. In analyzing these data, I will give special
attention to the role of children, marriage, and differences between former
West and East Germany. I will finish with a brief discussion on how present
reform plans in the German pension system will affect the lives of future
Gender Gap of the Financial Status in Old Age: Why are Older Women so Poor?
SODEI Takako, Ochanomizu University
Everywhere in the world, the core of the poor is elderly women living alone.
Why is this the case? First, housework, childcare and the care of elderly
are mostly in the hands of women; these tasks are unpaid work and their monetary
values are not considered. Second, in many countries, women have to stop
working because of their family, thus their old age pension is low and they
are hardly in the position to gather own assets. Third, because of a gender
gap within the workplace, women’s jobs are generally insecure with lower
Such a gender gap is much more prominent in Japan because of gender role
ideology based on the traditional patriarchal family system. In spite of
an increase in the number of married women in the labor force, the gender
role ideology of “men at work and women at home” remains very much alive.
The wage system as well as the social security system are still based on
the stereotype image of “husband as head of household and wife as his dependent.”
Recently, however, such systems have been widely criticized. There are disputes
over whether the unit of the social security system should change from household
to individual, and whether both the spouse exemption and the special spouse
exemption of income tax should be abolished.
In my paper I will discuss the present state of the gender gap, its underlying
reasons as well as possible future changes.
Day 2 September 11th (Wednesday)
Panel 4: New Legal Issues in Occupational and Personal Pensions
Recent reforms in Japan and Germany have strengthened the role of occupational and personal pension schemes. Continuing the discussion on the topic raised by Panel 2, this panel further analyzes how these reforms have affected legal issues such as disclosure standards, fiduciary duties and portability of pension rights. Are we seeing similar developments in both nations? If not, how can persisting differences be explained?
Occupational and Private Pension Reform in Germany: A Legal Perspective
Yves JORENS, Ghent University, Belgium
Confronted with demographic developments, high rates of unemployment and consequent financial problems, the German pension system has undergone several changes (“reforms”) over the past ten years.
The last reform, also referred to as the “Riester Rente”, has two objectives: First, to avoid a permanent increase in contribution rates, and second, the introduction of a three-pillar pension system to Germany. In order to achieve these objectives the German pension reform is based on reducing statutory benefits, which are in turn compensated by the introduction of improvements to corporate pension schemes and by the implementation of capital-based personal pension schemes. The corporate pension systems were improved and made more attractive through four major changes (individual claims for employees, introduction of a new type of pension fund, improvements to the requirements for the acquisition of pension rights, and measures to facilitate changes of employers).
The introduction of voluntary personal pension schemes as a third-pillar system was a completely new development. Subsidies or tax reductions are granted by the state to motivate people to join this system. Different rules were introduced for regulating this third pillar which has the disadvantage of not being considered attractive enough for the market.
The Riester Rente is, however, only accessible for people who are insured with the statutory pension system and are liable to taxation in Germany. This is problematic for migrant workers and does not conform with some international obligations.
Reconsidering Japanese Corporate and Personal Pensions: From a Legal Point of View
MORITO Hideyuki, Seikei University
In 2001, with the formation of the “Defined Benefit Company Pension Law”
and the “Defined Contribution Company Pension Law”, Japanese corporate pensions
entered into a new era. This report examines the new system brought about
by the two legislative acts, along with law and government policy concerning
other corporate and individual pension plans.
First, definitions will be offered concerning the two categories, corporate
pension and individual pension, as these pertain to Japan. Particular attention
must be given here to the fact that Japanese corporate pensions presuppose,
as part of the Japanese employment tradition, the one-off retirement payment
system and continue to be deeply affected by it. Thus, social security pensions
and defined benefit company pensions are not to be seen as exemplifying corporate
pension systems, but should rather be examined in the context of lump-sum
retirement payments whose funding is not secured by outside sources.
Second, the history and background of the 2001 reforms will be presented,
along with an outline of two new laws. These two laws are sometimes mentioned
in the same breath; in fact, however, there are major and fundamental conceptual
differences between them. For example, although defined benefit company pensions
do not impose a limit on rewards for distinguished service, a characteristic
of traditional Japanese companies, defined contribution pensions are strongly
imbued with the notion of delayed wages for the retirement period, i.e.,
a means for guaranteed income throughout the remaining years of a person’s
Third, corporate and individual pensions are examined from the standpoint
of legal argumentation. Concretely, this means treating vesting, employment
change portability, the rectification of unprofitability, so-called trustee
responsibility, and the guarantee of payment in the event of corporate bankruptcy.
Finally, I will give a summary of future issues to be considered in the light
of the law.
Panel 5: Legal Guardianship and Consumer Protection in Long-term Care Insurance
During the 1990s, both Germany and Japan introduced new long-term care insurance systems, together with a new guardianship system. After several years in operation, a number of difficult questions have arisen, especially with regard to legal guardianship and consumer protection measures. This panel analyzes how legal objectives and instruments have recently developed in this field.
Principles of Legal Policy and the Development of Legal Guardianship in Germany
Peter WINTERSTEIN, Ministry of Justice of Mecklenburg–Western Pomerania
In 1992, a basic reform of the German legal guardianship law for adults (“Betreuungsgesetz”)
was enacted. The guiding principles of this law were the creation of a new
legal institute for more flexible and individual support of persons in need
of care, the abolishment of restrictions of the legal capacity of the supported
person, the extension of the courts’ control in the sphere of support in
personal issues, including complicated medical care, the improvement of the
situation of supporters and the creation of a singular, flexible law of procedure
at the high constitutional level.
However, due to difficulties with the realization of the law by the local
courts and because of increasing costs, the law had to be revised in January
1999 and the fee system for professional supporters was totally renewed.
Today, a commission of experts from the ministries of justice at the federal
and state level are discussing once again reform options because of problems
of quality and increasing costs.
In the first part of my paper I will give an account of what the legal guardianship
system in Germany aims to achieve and highlight the numerous problems which
have occurred since this legal institute was first introduced. I will then
give an overview of the current reform debate within the expert’s commission
and discuss the possible future direction of reform.
The Adult Guardianship Law and the Long-Term Care Insurance Law in the Context of New Social Welfare
ARAI Makoto, University of Tsukuba
In April 2000, Japan enacted adult guardianship legislation, necessitated
by our aging society and the increasing ineffectiveness of the old system.
This report points out the problems of the previous law; discusses the principles
behind the new law, such as normalization, respect for the right of individual
decision-making, full attention to livelihood protection; and looks into
how the law has been implemented since its passage. Comparisons will further
be drawn with the German Betreuungsgesetz [guardianship law], enacted in
Another law enacted in April 2000 concerns long-term care insurance. Its
goal is, besides a shift from government-imposed measures to a contractual
arrangement, the establishment of a new long-term care system. In addition
to being contractual, it will allow for the use of insurance when senility
has robbed the very elderly of the capacity of discernment. Thus, long-term
care insurance and adult guardianship are said to be two integral components;
in reality, however, the link is quite tenuous. This report will examine
the reasons for this and make a comparison with the German Pflegeversicherungsgesetz
[care insurance law], implemented in April 1995.
Panel 6: Recent Age- and Gender-Specific Legal Issues
Taking up and extending the topic of Panel 1, this panel analyzes recent and planned legal changes regarding age and gender. Neither Germany nor Japan have anti-age discrimination legislation, such as the “Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA)” in the United States. Also, legal requirements and actual practices at the workplace regarding gender tend to differ widely.
Legal Issues Relating to Age and Gender in Modern Japan – The Fourth Wave of the “Housewife Debate” since the 1990s and Issues of Legal Revisions
KATSUKATA Keiko, Waseda University
As population trend surveys make clear, the second population shift that took place in Japan was extremely short in comparison with that in Europe and America; significantly, it ended a mere 25 years after the end of the war. The main breadwinners in this demographic change were generated by the so-called baby-boom and junior baby-boom generations. They are said to have simultaneously encouraged both the foundation and the collapse of the Japanese industrial and family structures that supported it (the trend towards the nuclear family, the full-time housewife, the system of third-category health-insurance beneficiaries, and the M-curve for women’s employment).
In this connection, three waves of the “housewife debate” coincide precisely with this period. In these controversies, we can see mirrored the postwar history of a “Japanese-style” tug-of-war to modernize women in the direction either of “home-makers” or of “workers” – or, in other words, the ability to choose on the part of women, the domestic mainstay of the Japanese family, to adapt themselves gradually to the contemporary world, becoming both individualized and socialized.
In 1985, Japan ratified the “Convention on Elimination of all Forms of Discrimination Against Women”, thereby initiating a reevaluation of all domestic laws from a gender perspective. As a result, the “Nationality Law” was amended to allow the children of Japanese mothers and foreign fathers to obtain Japanese citizenship; then came the “Equal Opportunity Law”, legislation allowing for infant-care work leave, and the “Basic Law of Gender Equality”. We are now witnessing the fourth wave in the housewife debate. This paper examines the extent to which gender and age are taken into account in present discussions of legislation supporting women’s advancement in society, which is spurred on by changes in the social and industrial framework that include late marriages, non-marriage, a low birthrate, aging, a prolonged recession, and the IT revolution. Prospects for the future are also discussed.
Age- and Gender-Specific Legal Issues in Germany
Bernd SCHULTE, Max-Planck-Institute for Foreign and International Social Law, Munich
Neither Germany nor Japan have anti-age discrimination legislation such as the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA) of the United States; legal requirements and actual practices in society and, in particular, in the work place regarding sex and gender issues tend to differ widely. Thus, a case exists for a comparative study of the legal situation in both countries. Attention will be focused on the special situation of disabled persons with regard to equality of treatment and, in particular, opportunity of employment in this respect.
A case study concerning an elderly worker will illustrate the attitudes of the German legislator, the administration, and the social partners, i.e. the employers and trade unions regarding the thorny issue of age discrimination. The term ‘age discrimination’ applies to situations in which the use of age to differentiate cannot be justified and results in an unfair treatment of elderly persons.
There are many legal instruments in Germany for the equal treatment of men and women, starting with the constitution, i.e. the Basic Law (Grundgesetz, GG) of 1949, which stipulates in Article 3 (2) GG that “men and women shall have equal rights”. With the application of this provision German courts have primarily sought to reduce long existing discrepancies regarding unequal pay for equal work or work of equal value for men and women. However, a more important impact on the legal situation of women with regard to men devolves from European Community Law, which takes precedence on any legal provisions of the Member States. Quite a number of directives and social action programs established and expanded an EC/EU equal opportunities
policy, which led to the strengthening of individual rights to achieve equal treatment and to promote equal opportunities. In the years to come, anti-discrimination legislation on the EU level will be extended to, among others (e.g., racial and ethnic minorities), disabled persons. The European Year of the Disabled 2003 will be a forum for presenting this issue.
Panel 7: Non-Profit Organizations and Civil Society
Panel 3 examined the economic role of the non-profit sector and its changing objectives. This panel takes a closer look at this sector’s changing legal framework and points out major similarities and differences between the Japanese and German cases.
The Legal System Concerning Civil Non-Profit Activities and the Movement to Reform it
AMEMIYA Takako, Shoin Women’s University
An obvious development after the Great Hanshin Earthquake of 1995 was the
swift and flexible response of many volunteers and citizens from those groups
that form non-profit organizations. This prompted debate on the need for
revised legislation, including the tax code, of such bodies. In 1998 the
“Law to Promote Specified Non-Profit Activities (NPO-Law)” was passed, allowing
NPOs to become more easily “juridical persons for the public good”. 2001
saw additional legislation giving them favored tax status; later in the year,
a law was passed regarding intermediate non-profit and non-public-organizations.
The “juridical persons for the public good system” has been in place within
Japanese civil law for over a century, but it has not functioned well. Such
organizations struggled along amidst the red-tape of official authorizations
with bureaucrats breathing down their necks. And there were many problems:
the only endeavors possible were those over which the authorities exercised
authority; small-scale organizations could not become juridical persons.
Furthermore, lack of any obligation to supply and release information led
to the oft-manifested evils of the system, including the constraints imposed
by the discretionary power of officialdom and the incestuous relationships
between government and the private sector, such as the post-retirement hiring
(“heavenly descent”) of high-level bureaucrats. The system of “juridical
persons for the public good”, as legislated by civil law, referring in a
broad sense to NPOs as well, has shown signs of structural fatigue in its
efforts to respond quickly to the free-wheeling ideas and diverse needs of
the population. With the dawn of the 21st century, we can eventually see
a wave of reform sweeping over all societal bodies, including non-profit
In March 2002, the government, as part of its general administrative reform
efforts, announced its intention to achieve in due course a “juridical persons
for the public good system reform” within the year.
It would appear that it is less a matter of the NPO law or the middle-sized
corporation law but more the correctional scalpel that is finally being applied
to a civil law which had remained untouched for more than 100 years, forcing
public-benefit bodies to be subject to official fiat. The law would now seem
to be on its way to reform.
The Changing Legal Framework for Foundations as Non-Profit-Organizations in Germany
Nikolaus TURNER, Kester-Haeusler-Foundation, Fürstenfeldbruck
One to two foundations are established each day in Germany and are officially
authorized or recognized as stipulated in the last law amendment, which replaced
the former official “authorization” with the new “recognition” of foundations.
Foundations are becoming increasingly popular in Germany and enjoy growing
interest not only among the prosperous. Legal changes that have taken place
over the past years, and which I will discuss in my paper, have been motivated
more by the pitiful state of diminished public funds than by the recognition
of any real conviction on the part of politicians or through an increasing
awareness of civil society of the public. Despite this fact, certain improvements
have been made which go beyond mere cosmetic changes, although many of the
wishes of the foundations and their representatives still remain unheard.
The realization of such wishes will remain a topical issue for politicians
during the next legislative term.
I will present a survey of current changes in legislation covering legal
rights for foundations and the tax laws governing these institutions. After
analyzing the reform-movement and reform-debates of the past few years, I
will finally discuss much-needed legal changes to further improve the standing
of the non-profit-sector in Germany.
ARAI Makoto, University of Tsukuba
Day 1 September 10th (Tuesday)
Trends in Income Inequality Among Retirement Age Population in Japan - From the Viewpoint of International Comparison
YAMADA Atsuhiro, Keiō University
Recent articles suggest that the trend of an increasing inequality of income
in Japan can be explained by the aging population. However, its concrete
relationship is not self-explanatory. The aim of this paper is to answer
the various questions about the factors of income inequality of the retirement-age
population in Japan, based on the most comprehensive data of nine OECD countries.
The data are nationally comparative and also consistent in time series. Japanese
data have been included for the first time. Recently developed techniques
were employed to examine the complicated interaction between the trend of
income inequality among the retirement-age population and evolving retirement
income package, or household formation.
The international comparison succeeded in characterizing the trend of income
equality among the retirement-age population in Japan. First, the income
inequality of the retirement-age population is larger than that of the working-age
population. The main contributor to the income inequality of the retirement-age
population is the relevant importance of their working income, and indeed, the rate of labor force participation of older people in Japan is quite high.
Second, even among the low-income group of the retirement-age population, the ratio of working income to disposable income is the highest among the nine countries, coinciding with the importance of social transfer which is
relatively low. Nevertheless, the importance of a working income in Japan
has rapidly decreased in the last decade, and social benefits have increased
in importance, especially in the middle-income group. As a consequence, over
the last decade, a large part of resources for social benefits is shifting
to the middle-income group. Third, the income inequality of the retirement-age
population has decreased. This is because of the effect of a diminishing
income difference in each household type (which is defined by household size
and the number of earners and between each household type) exceeds the effect
of changing proportion of each household type.
Welfare State Reform in Germany and the Shifting Principles of Redistributive Justice. Is the Pension Reform Symptomatic?
Ute KLAMMER, Institute for Economics and Social Research, WSI
Within the recent pension reform in Germany there is an obvious shift of
the underlying principles of redistributive justice: By cutting down the
public pay-as-you-go system and partially replacing it with a new capital-funded private pension
system, the redistributive elements of social security were reduced. At the
same time, however, the ideas of equivalence (between contributions and benefits)
and individual responsibility gained in importance. Nonetheless, other elements
of the reform, such as more redistributive elements in favor of mothers with
incomplete working biographies and a better minimum protection of poor elderly,
point toward opposing ideas of social justice.
The paper tries to illuminate the different normative principles and to answer
the question of whether a consistent “new logic” can be identified behind
the reform. By analyzing the actual economic inequality among elderly and
by examining the predicted future developments of inequality resulting from
changes in work, life style and family patterns, the question is raised whether
the principles behind the reform match these new challenges for protection
in old age. Finally, the paper tries to analyze whether the aims and principles
of the German pension reform are in line with: a) reforms in other areas
of the German welfare state (esp. active labor market policy, social assistance
reform and family policy); and b) the main principles of other recent European
Pensions in Japan: Searching for a New Paradigm
TAKAYAMA Noriyuki, Hitotsubashi University
Japan already has the oldest population in the world. The 2002 update of
population projections makes the future look even more bleek. By 2025, the
required contribution rate for the principal program of social security pensions
will be 1.8 times higher than the current level (17.35 percentage point)
if current legislated benefits are to be maintained. Since social security
contributions for pensions have become the No. 1 income source for central
government, further increases are certain to have an even greater negative
effect on the Japanese economy, while younger generations will be more inclined
to regard their participation in the social security pension system with
greater skepticism with respect to future returns. Moreover, employers are
seriously considering how to avoid social security pension contributions.
Growing concerns are now observed in Japan with regard to the “taste of pie”
rather than the “size of pie”. The basic design of the pension program should
be incentive-compatible. Contributions should be much more directly linked
with old-age pension benefits, while elements of social adequacy should be
incorporated in a separate tier of pension benefits and financed by other
sources, including a consumption-based tax.
Shifting to a new regime as mentioned above will cause considerable reductions
in social security pension benefits in the future. Current older generations
still enjoy very generous pension benefits at the cost of their children
and/or grandchildren (i.e., actively working generations) who are currently
suffering from reductions in their nominal amount of salaries/bonuses as
well as from increased unemployment. Next
year, the current account for the principal social security pension scheme
in Japan will turn into a deficit, making structural reform inevitable.
The majority of people in Japan are quite reluctant to accept further increases
in taxes and/or social security contributions. Under such circumstances,
people are to be further encouraged to establish self-reliance after retirement.
A new defined-contribution plan was established last year, and from April
2002, hybrid plans, similar to the U.S. cash balance plans, were initiated.
With stronger tax incentives, private initiatives will increase in due course.
The future picture on distribution of old-age income in Japan may be quite
Panel 3: The Role of the Non-Profit Sector
Non-profit organizations are major players in civil society. Their role is to mediate between the individual and the large mega-structure of the market, create important social capital, and impart democratic values and habits. Areas from which the state has withdrawn seem to present new objectives and challenges for non-profit organizations. This panel analyzes the economic leverage of this sector, its changing objectives, as well as its functional similarities and differences in both countries.
The Non-Profit Sector in Germany
Ulrich F. BRÖMMLING, Association of German Foundations
For many decades, the social and economic importance of the non-profit-sector in Germany was underestimated by politicians, citizens, and the general public. However, in recent years discussions about the activities and capabilities of the non-profit-sector have intensified. The activities of non-profit-sector organizations are no longer seen just as “stop gaps” for tasks and functions that the state is no longer able to fulfill because of tighter public budgets. At the same time, associations, societies, foundations, and initiatives are an important factor of the liberal-democratic system of the German state. They indicate that citizens are making their stakes in community and the commonwealth – over and above their tax liability. There are about 540,000 associations and 11,000 foundations in Germany. More than half the population in Germany are volunteers, but there remains an even greater potential for voluntary engagement.
My paper will deal with the question of the non-profit-sector’s social and economic importance. In this context, the terms “non-profit-sector”, “third sector”, “private sector”, which are often used wrongly, will be defined. I will then exemplify the societal role of various kinds of foundations and place the whole sector in an international comparative perspective. By analyzing the various problems of the non-profit sector in Germany, I will finally highlight possible risks and opportunities for future progress.
The Growth and Expansion of Non-Profit Organizations Under the Long-Term Care Insurance System
ADACHI Kiyoshi, Kyūshū University
As the system of social welfare in Japan is a state responsibility, the activities
of private non-profit organizations have been limited. Nevertheless, with
the shift of welfare needs to regional and home-care levels, fundamental
structural reform has taken place. Since the late 1980s, welfare institutions involving ordinary
citizens have spread throughout the country, for example, volunteer groups
helping elderly people living alone with various domestic tasks. Most of
these organizations have acquired the status of a juridical person under
the “Law to Promote Specified Non-Profit Activities (NPO-Law)” and are now
working to develop and expand within the framework of the public long-term
care insurance system. Welfare NPOs play a substantial role in the reform
of the system through diversification, decentralization, and privatization
of bodies providing such assistance. Moreover, they continue to have an impact
on social welfare and social security in various ways, for example, through
their competitive influence on already existing welfare organizations, or
by offering their services to users and by developing and experimenting with
innovative approaches in response to the new regional needs.
In 2001, we conducted a national survey of welfare NPOs involved in nursing
care insurance, dividing them into six categories according to criteria such
as historical development, organization, scale of operations, nursing-care
insurance services, and participation of volunteers outside the system, and
abstracting a model for developing NPOs, initially offering only visitor
health care, followed by facilities and bases, and eventually comprehensive
operations, including minor long-term care facilities. NPOs demonstrate various
developments within the system of long-term care insurance, thereby learning
how to offer not only those services they already provide but also services
that respond to welfare needs including transportation, meals, and help before
and after regular schedules. NPOs continue to influence regional communities
and government. The private non-profit sector has not only grown on the basis
of the new long-term care insurance system, but it has also changed the Japanese
welfare system. This report analyzes the current situation based on the above
survey and provides further comments on issues for the future.
The Role of Political Foundations in Germany
Gebhard HIELSCHER, Friedrich-Ebert-Foundation
The Friedrich Ebert Stiftung (FES) was originally established in 1925 following the death of Friedrich Ebert, the first President of the Weimar Republic, and Chairman of the Social Democratic Party of Germany (SPD). Outlawed by the Nazis in 1933, the FES was reactivated in 1947 and later chose Bonn, the capital of West Germany, as its headquarters. After the re-unification of Germany, the FES established a second head office in Berlin, located on Hiroshimastrasse near the Embassy of Japan.
The FES is one of five major political foundations based in Germany and operating both within the country and abroad. The other four are the Konrad Adenauer Stiftung, linked to the Christian Democratic Union (CDU) and named after the first chancellor of the “old” Federal Republic of Germany; the Hanns Seidel Stiftung, affiliated with the Christian Social Union (CSU), the Bavarian sister party of the CDU; the Friedrich Naumann Stiftung associated with the Free Democratic Party (FDP); and the Heinrich
Böll Stiftung established by the federal party Alliance 90/The Greens and bearing the name of a Nobel Laureate for Literature.
While the five foundations do compete politically, they nevertheless agreed on a joint statement defining their objectives, purpose, and values. This common basis may even lead to practical cooperation, for instance, when the Chairman of the Naumann Stiftung and former Minister of Economics, Otto Graf Lambsdorff, accepted an invitation by the FES to be one of the main speakers at a recent forum in Tōkyō about compensation for forced labor during World War II.