Deutsches Institut für Japanstudien nav lang search
日本語EnglishDeutsch
Deutsches Institut für Japanstudien
Writing With, Against, or for Machines? Generative AI and the Question of Authorship

Download

Venue

Online (Zoom)

Registration Info

This is a past event. Registration is no longer possible.

This is a public event. Please be aware that audio-visual recordings may be made, stored, and published during and after the event.

follow us on Bluesky Follow us on Bluesky.

DIJ Mailing Lists

Please subscribe below to stay informed about our research activities, events & publications:

    Choose Subscription:

    = required field



    Writing With, Against, or for Machines? Generative AI and the Question of Authorship

    March 19, 2025 / 6.00pm (JST) / 10.00am (CET)

    Kateryna Shabelnyk, Nagoya University

    Whether in Japan or elsewhere, the creation of books has never been an individual endeavor. Most noticeable in the publishing process, where texts are written, edited, and proofread by multiple individuals, the plurality of authorship is evident, though often overlooked. Locating this plurality can be challenging enough in contexts such as literary translation, but the issue becomes even more complex when machines enter the equation.

    The AI boom following the public release of ChatGPT in November 2022 sparked debates on the ethical use of generative tools and copyright issues. At the same time, however, it also prompted a reconsideration of the inherent fluidity of authorship as a concept in both arts and literature. In this presentation, the speaker examined how authorship is negotiated in contemporary Japanese literature in the context of AI. She focused on several case studies—from The Day a Computer Writes a Novel (2016) by the Kimagure jinkō chinō no sakka desunoyo project to Sympathy Tower Tokyo (2024) by Rie Qudan. She argued that each of them demonstrates how the notion of who (and what) can be an “author” has been gradually expanding over the past decade.

    Writing with AI tools does not simply mean using them; it also requires adapting to their constraints and possibilities. Unlike other writing assistants, such tools can suggest ideas, provide feedback, or even completely rewrite a text—activities that warrant acknowledgment as a co-author or at least as an editor. And yet they are never truly autonomous, as they require human guidance at every stage of the process. By analyzing what form this (co)-authorship takes in my case studies, this presentation addressed the question: “Does writing with AI mean writing with, against, or, ultimately, for machines?”

    Kateryna Shabelnyk is a first-year PhD student at Nagoya University. Her dissertation project examines the impact of text-generative AI tools on contemporary Japanese literature, focusing on literary prizes. She is particularly interested in how recent developments in AI complicate the categories of authorship, originality, and creativity. Presently, she is working under the interdisciplinary TokAI BOOST fellowship.