Vocational and industrial training loomed large in Japanese colonial education in Korea. Between 1910 and 1945, Japanese authorities implemented an education system that concentrated on industrial education for Koreans, who were generally portrayed as possessing a low level of civilization. Geared toward assimilating Koreans as Japanese subjects, this system was characterized by segregation and discrimination with severely restricted access to higher education for Koreans. Comparing the perspectives of  missionaries, Korean students, and Japanese colonial authorities, Dolf-Alexander Neuhaus‘ book chapter “Training the Heart, the Head, and the Hand”: Colonial Education, Missionaries, and Industrial Schools in Korea, 1906–1930 examines the YMCA’s pioneering role in industrial education as a site where Protestant work ethics, Korean aspirations for modernization, and colonial policy converged — and sometimes directly conflicted. The chapter is published in The Gospel of Work and Money. Industrial Education and Its Global Legacies, ed.by Oli Charbonneau and Karine V. Walther (University of Pennsylvania Press 2026).

Innovation, games, machizukuri, climate, and ‘the mouse’: the winter issue of our DIJ Newsletter features updates on our research, publications, and events as well as news from the Institute, our team, and our outreach activities. We hope you will enjoy exploring this new edition of the DIJ Newsletter. If you haven’t done so yet, you can subscribe to receive our Newsletters directly to your inbox. The full issues and subscription form are available here.

Two new studies by DIJ researcher Harald Kümmerle were recently published. His book chapter “Bridging Göttingen and Tokyo: Oral Culture and the Dynamics of Mathematical Knowledge”, published in Felix Klein’s Foreign Students. Opening Up the Way for Transnational Mathematics (Birkhäuser Cham 2025), examines the reception of Felix Klein’s school of mathematical productivity in Japan, particularly at Tokyo Imperial University, whose central position within Japan contrasts with Göttingen University’s peripheral position within Germany. The study focuses on the work of two Japanese mathematicians, Tsuruichi Hayashi and Takuji Yoshiye. Harald’s article “Datenströme und Raumordnung. Japans Regulierungsmodell im globalen Kontext” (Data flows and spatial order. Japan’s regulatory model in a global context), published in German in the Zeitschrift für Digitalisierung und Recht (4/2025), studies how data flows are embedded in geographical and economic orders and constitute spaces themselves. Focusing on developments in Japan, the article shows that data flows are not only technical or regulatory objects, but space-constituting phenomena in which Japan’s consensus-oriented regulatory model appears as a relevant factor in global order-making.

How have Germany and Japan used digital technologies during the COVID-19 pandemic? From the perspective of two divergent epistemologies of data, the open access article “From Data Universalism to Data Particularism: Epistemologizing Digital Sovereignty Based on Germany’s and Japan’s COVID-19 Responses” (Global Studies Quarterly, Vol. 5, Issue 3)  by DIJ’s Harald Kümmerle and Johannes Thumfart (Brussels) compares both countries’ use of data and their responses to the pandemic. Observing that Japan outperformed Germany in terms of selected key metrics at the end of the COVID-19 pandemic, the article argues that data particularism, as exemplified in Japan’s COVID-19 response, can be a valuable strategy to address the epistemic and political shortcomings of data universalism. In particular, the authors argue that in the context of the broader debate about digital sovereignty, data particularism is attractive for traditional manufacturing powers, such as Japan and Germany, that are rich in context-specific data but dependent on US and Chinese Big Tech.